t12d3411ht_a634f799a498_6f77ef117592
Seen in live traffic; not in the curated database.
What this fingerprint encodes
t12d3411ht
handshake shape, human-readable
a634f799a498
truncated hash of the cipher list
6f77ef117592
truncated hash of extensions + signature algorithms
- Transport
- TCP
- TLS version
- TLS 1.2
- Server name
- server name sent
- Cipher suites offered
- 34
- Extensions offered
- 11
- ALPN
- ht
Same tool, different options
These 3 other fingerprints share this one's JA4_c — the extension and signature-algorithm hash. A client that keeps its extension set constant while varying its cipher list produces exactly this pattern, which is what a scanner iterating cipher suites looks like. A JA3 cannot show you this: its single MD5 collapses ciphers and extensions together, so every variation looks like an unrelated client.
- t11d6911ht_ea0618708e31_6f77ef117592
- t12d3511ht_66c735deec94_6f77ef117592
- t12d6911hq_ea0618708e31_6f77ef117592
The hello it was computed from
Recovered because the proxy now stores the pre-hash JA3 string alongside the digest. Every number below came out of this client's ClientHello; anything we cannot name in the IANA registry is shown as its raw value rather than guessed at.
- Version
- TLS 1.2
Cipher suites 34
-
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA -
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 -
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 -
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA -
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384 -
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 -
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256 -
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA384 -
TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_GCM_SHA256 -
TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_GCM_SHA384 -
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 -
TLS_AES_128_CCM_8_SHA256 -
TLS_AES_128_CCM_SHA256 -
TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 -
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 (draft) -
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA -
TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA -
TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA -
TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 -
TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_ARIA_128_GCM_SHA256 -
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_ARIA_128_GCM_SHA256 -
TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 -
TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA -
TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256 -
TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_ARIA_256_GCM_SHA384 -
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_ARIA_256_GCM_SHA384 -
TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 -
TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA -
TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256 -
TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA -
TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256 -
7 (0x0007) -
TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5 -
TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA
Extensions 11
-
server_name -
extended_master_secret -
max_fragment_length -
renegotiation_info -
supported_groups -
ec_point_formats -
session_ticket -
application_layer_protocol_negotiation -
signature_algorithms -
key_share -
psk_key_exchange_modes
Named groups 4
-
x25519 -
secp256r1 -
secp384r1 -
secp521r1
Point formats 1
-
uncompressed
Raw JA3 string
771,49171-49191-49199-49172-49192-49200-49248-49249-49270-49271-52392-4869-4868-4867-52243-49169-10-47-60-49308-49312-156-53-61-49309-49313-157-65-186-132-192-7-4-5,0-23-1-65281-10-11-35-16-13-51-45,29-23-24-25,0
Seen in live traffic
- Connections
- 4
- First seen
- 2026-08-22 23:53 UTC
- Last seen
- 2026-08-23 03:17 UTC
- Transport
- TCP
This entry is an observation, not a policy decision. It is here because the edge saw it, not because anyone reviewed it, and it blocks nothing on its own. Only the curated tier drives classification and banning.