PQ CRYPTA PLATFORM

🏠 Main

🧪 Interactive Apps

📰 News

🛡️ PQ Crypta Proxy

👤 Account

⟨ QUANTUM ERROR PORTAL ⟩

Navigate the Error Dimensions

PQ Crypta Logo

JA4 Fingerprint Directory

The database this edge classifies live traffic against — decoded, not just listed

API client

t13d1713ht_ab0a1bf427ad_23c7dd8c4d5c

Python requests — inferred from the User-Agent on its requests.

What this fingerprint encodes

JA4_a t13d1713ht handshake shape, human-readable
JA4_b ab0a1bf427ad truncated hash of the cipher list
JA4_c 23c7dd8c4d5c truncated hash of extensions + signature algorithms
Transport
TCP
TLS version
TLS 1.3
Server name
server name sent
Cipher suites offered
17
Extensions offered
13
ALPN
ht

Same tool, different options

These 1 other fingerprints share this one's JA4_c — the extension and signature-algorithm hash. A client that keeps its extension set constant while varying its cipher list produces exactly this pattern, which is what a scanner iterating cipher suites looks like. A JA3 cannot show you this: its single MD5 collapses ciphers and extensions together, so every variation looks like an unrelated client.

The hello it was computed from

Recovered because the proxy now stores the pre-hash JA3 string alongside the digest. Every number below came out of this client's ClientHello; anything we cannot name in the IANA registry is shown as its raw value rather than guessed at.

Version
TLS 1.2

Cipher suites 17

Extensions 13

Named groups 8

Point formats 3

Raw JA3 string
771,4866-4867-4865-49196-49200-49195-49199-52393-52392-49188-49192-49187-49191-159-158-107-103,65281-0-11-10-16-22-23-49-13-43-45-51-27,4588-29-23-30-24-25-256-257,0-1-2

Seen in live traffic

Connections
2
First seen
2026-08-23 00:26 UTC
Last seen
2026-08-23 03:40 UTC
Transport
TCP

User-Agents seen on this fingerprint

A User-Agent is self-declared and trivially forged, so this names an observation rather than proving an identity. It is still the strongest signal available: the fingerprint comes off the TLS handshake and the User-Agent off the request that followed, and one client build keeping a stable JA4 while changing what it calls itself is a finding in its own right.

This entry is an observation, not a policy decision. It is here because the edge saw it, not because anyone reviewed it, and it blocks nothing on its own. Only the curated tier drives classification and banning.