PQ CRYPTA PLATFORM

🏠 Main

🧪 Interactive Apps

📰 News

🛡️ PQ Crypta Proxy

👤 Account

⟨ QUANTUM ERROR PORTAL ⟩

Navigate the Error Dimensions

PQ Crypta Logo

JA4 Fingerprint Directory

What this edge classifies traffic against, plus what it actually sees — decoded and named, not just listed

Unclassified

t13d2013ht_2b729b4bf6f3_b9165cb4b096

Presented a User-Agent we cannot attribute to a known client.

What this fingerprint encodes

JA4_a t13d2013ht handshake shape, human-readable
JA4_b 2b729b4bf6f3 truncated hash of the cipher list
JA4_c b9165cb4b096 truncated hash of extensions + signature algorithms
Transport
TCP
TLS version
TLS 1.3
Server name
server name sent
Cipher suites offered
20
Extensions offered
13
ALPN
ht

Same tool, different options

These 2 other fingerprints share this one's JA4_c — the extension and signature-algorithm hash. A client that keeps its extension set constant while varying its cipher list produces exactly this pattern, which is what a scanner iterating cipher suites looks like. A JA3 cannot show you this: its single MD5 collapses ciphers and extensions together, so every variation looks like an unrelated client.

The hello it was computed from

Recovered because the proxy now stores the pre-hash JA3 string alongside the digest. Every number below came out of this client's ClientHello; anything we cannot name in the IANA registry is shown as its raw value rather than guessed at.

Version
TLS 1.2

Cipher suites 20

Extensions 13

Named groups 3

Point formats 1

Raw JA3 string
771,4866-4865-49196-49195-49200-49199-49188-49187-49192-49191-49162-49161-49172-49171-157-156-61-60-53-47,0-5-43-13-35-10-11-16-51-49-23-65281-45,29-23-24,0

Seen in live traffic

Connections
1
First seen
2026-08-23 15:55 UTC
Last seen
2026-08-23 15:55 UTC
Transport
TCP

User-Agents seen on this fingerprint

A User-Agent is self-declared and trivially forged, so this names an observation rather than proving an identity. It is still the strongest signal available: the fingerprint comes off the TLS handshake and the User-Agent off the request that followed, and one client build keeping a stable JA4 while changing what it calls itself is a finding in its own right.

This entry is an observation, not a policy decision. It is here because the edge saw it, not because anyone reviewed it, and it blocks nothing on its own. Only the curated tier drives classification and banning.