PQ CRYPTA PLATFORM

🏠 Main

🧪 Interactive Apps

📰 News

🛡️ PQ Crypta Proxy

👤 Account

⟨ QUANTUM ERROR PORTAL ⟩

Navigate the Error Dimensions

PQ Crypta Logo

JA4 Fingerprint Directory

What this edge classifies traffic against, plus what it actually sees — decoded and named, not just listed

Unclassified

t13d361200_36d08471d71c_f0d148687978

Presented a User-Agent we cannot attribute to a known client.

What this fingerprint encodes

JA4_a t13d361200 handshake shape, human-readable
JA4_b 36d08471d71c truncated hash of the cipher list
JA4_c f0d148687978 truncated hash of extensions + signature algorithms
Transport
TCP
TLS version
TLS 1.3
Server name
server name sent
Cipher suites offered
36
Extensions offered
12
ALPN
none offered

Same tool, different options

These 1 other fingerprints share this one's JA4_c — the extension and signature-algorithm hash. A client that keeps its extension set constant while varying its cipher list produces exactly this pattern, which is what a scanner iterating cipher suites looks like. A JA3 cannot show you this: its single MD5 collapses ciphers and extensions together, so every variation looks like an unrelated client.

The hello it was computed from

Recovered because the proxy now stores the pre-hash JA3 string alongside the digest. Every number below came out of this client's ClientHello; anything we cannot name in the IANA registry is shown as its raw value rather than guessed at.

Version
TLS 1.2

Cipher suites 36

Extensions 12

Named groups 10

Point formats 1

Raw JA3 string
771,4865-156-60-47-4866-4867-157-61-53-255-49195-49199-49187-49191-49197-49201-49189-49193-49161-49171-49156-49166-49196-52393-49200-52392-49188-49192-49198-49202-49190-49194-49162-49172-49157-49167,0-5-10-11-17-23-35-13-43-45-50-51,29-23-24-25-30-256-257-258-259-260,0

Seen in live traffic

Connections
2
First seen
2026-08-23 20:22 UTC
Last seen
2026-08-23 20:22 UTC
Transport
TCP

User-Agents seen on this fingerprint

A User-Agent is self-declared and trivially forged, so this names an observation rather than proving an identity. It is still the strongest signal available: the fingerprint comes off the TLS handshake and the User-Agent off the request that followed, and one client build keeping a stable JA4 while changing what it calls itself is a finding in its own right.

This entry is an observation, not a policy decision. It is here because the edge saw it, not because anyone reviewed it, and it blocks nothing on its own. Only the curated tier drives classification and banning.