q13d0311h3_55b375c5d22e_512ac2397e4d
PQCrypta HTTP/3 scanner — inferred from the User-Agent on its requests.
What this fingerprint encodes
q13d0311h3
handshake shape, human-readable
55b375c5d22e
truncated hash of the cipher list
512ac2397e4d
truncated hash of extensions + signature algorithms
- Transport
- QUIC
- TLS version
- TLS 1.3
- Server name
- server name sent
- Cipher suites offered
- 3
- Extensions offered
- 11
- ALPN
- h3
The hello it was computed from
Recovered because the proxy now stores the pre-hash JA3 string alongside the digest. Every number below came out of this client's ClientHello; anything we cannot name in the IANA registry is shown as its raw value rather than guessed at.
- Version
- TLS 1.2
Cipher suites 3
-
TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 -
TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 -
TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256
Extensions 11
-
ec_point_formats -
extended_master_secret -
server_name -
quic_transport_parameters -
supported_groups -
psk_key_exchange_modes -
key_share -
supported_versions -
application_layer_protocol_negotiation -
signature_algorithms -
status_request
Named groups 4
-
SecP256r1MLKEM768 -
x25519 -
secp256r1 -
secp384r1
Point formats 1
-
uncompressed
Raw JA3 string
771,4866-4865-4867,11-23-0-57-10-45-51-43-16-13-5,4588-29-23-24,0
Seen in live traffic
- Connections
- 4393
- First seen
- 2026-09-14 18:12 UTC
- Last seen
- 2026-10-09 20:26 UTC
- Transport
- QUIC
- JA3 hashes absorbed
- 4258
The same client, 4258 different JA3s
This one JA4 covers 4258 distinct JA3 hashes. A JA3 hashes the cipher and extension lists in the order they arrived, so a client that shuffles them — which Chrome and its derivatives do on purpose — produces a new JA3 almost every connection and fragments into what looks like 4258 unrelated clients. JA4 sorts those lists before hashing, which is why all of it lands here instead.
c5aed400a2c9fce2bebfbca726d66ba1cdc7b403a8647d8d6cfb551adba3ea2b4bd7020104457b10b1a7f5c78f783c5fe4ece23550f2929ba12b27992cbab3892a65e1912856ac5831a3e3b03fe1bd9b5ca8c96fd278e27e4565b4780a76338fc7cfb48f6b4ac3d0ed2e685a2ce3a647eefacaca593165141abd5e436de081822f22d1dab62a1596e4452d1303c9274f4e1cabb6660a260b148830679870a3ee2e1b53620e837e35e314d65d57f74e3ac0b56d8682fffe18d2532970a7022309- … and 4246 more
User-Agents seen on this fingerprint
PQCrypta-HTTP3-Scanner/1.03412×
A User-Agent is self-declared and trivially forged, so this names an observation rather than proving an identity. It is still the strongest signal available: the fingerprint comes off the TLS handshake and the User-Agent off the request that followed, and one client build keeping a stable JA4 while changing what it calls itself is a finding in its own right.
This entry is an observation, not a policy decision. It is here because the edge saw it, not because anyone reviewed it, and it blocks nothing on its own. Only the curated tier drives classification and banning.