q13d0313h3_55b375c5d22e_824790d21c68
Firefox — inferred from the User-Agent on its requests.
What this fingerprint encodes
q13d0313h3
handshake shape, human-readable
55b375c5d22e
truncated hash of the cipher list
824790d21c68
truncated hash of extensions + signature algorithms
- Transport
- QUIC
- TLS version
- TLS 1.3
- Server name
- server name sent
- Cipher suites offered
- 3
- Extensions offered
- 13
- ALPN
- h3
The hello it was computed from
Recovered because the proxy now stores the pre-hash JA3 string alongside the digest. Every number below came out of this client's ClientHello; anything we cannot name in the IANA registry is shown as its raw value rather than guessed at.
- Version
- TLS 1.2
Cipher suites 3
-
TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 -
TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 -
TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
Extensions 13
-
encrypted_client_hello -
server_name -
supported_versions -
quic_transport_parameters -
record_size_limit -
key_share -
application_layer_protocol_negotiation -
status_request -
psk_key_exchange_modes -
supported_groups -
34 (0x0022) -
compress_certificate -
signature_algorithms
Named groups 5
-
SecP256r1MLKEM768 -
x25519 -
secp256r1 -
secp384r1 -
secp521r1
Raw JA3 string
771,4865-4867-4866,65037-0-43-57-28-51-16-5-45-10-34-27-13,4588-29-23-24-25,
Seen in live traffic
- Connections
- 69
- First seen
- 2026-09-03 13:23 UTC
- Last seen
- 2026-10-06 11:13 UTC
- Transport
- QUIC
- JA3 hashes absorbed
- 69
The same client, 69 different JA3s
This one JA4 covers 69 distinct JA3 hashes. A JA3 hashes the cipher and extension lists in the order they arrived, so a client that shuffles them — which Chrome and its derivatives do on purpose — produces a new JA3 almost every connection and fragments into what looks like 69 unrelated clients. JA4 sorts those lists before hashing, which is why all of it lands here instead.
1a1681c85bb37bf343e4762eeca0f13ba62620bb71b13899ddc32355910fbc5e0f6bb16e172eeb4c660d7f55132004da2a4954c0188a1f501cd9e79605ed76ef268afc709512e3b0484c4cd54d9147b886cdcfd8a83217dc7624e1cf13f1ce13efabfc4ed86249058abcbacfaedcb6c9705261c311893554bbc562542c2d62adca71bfa172031976fd0f136bca83a3a6a3925b32f0ae144aaa328d5599ad2ea6a8ea13e37957f472ef625ec2ba614b1aeeb141eb23be5ad23a8ebb5dbffce33e- … and 57 more
User-Agents seen on this fingerprint
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:155.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/155.0546×Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:155.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/155.0267×Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:154.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/154.0200×Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:153.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/153.089×Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:155.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/155.086×Mozilla/5.0 (Android 16; Mobile; rv:157.0) Gecko/157.0 Firefox/157.083×Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:153.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/153.074×Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:152.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/152.051×Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:154.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/154.039×Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:155.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/155.038×Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:157.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/157.038×Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:154.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/154.037×Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:151.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/151.033×Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/154.0.0.0 Safari/537.3628×Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:147.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/147.028×Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:157.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/157.024×Mozilla/5.0 (Android 14; Mobile; rv:154.0) Gecko/154.0 Firefox/154.024×Mozilla/5.0 (Android 15; Mobile; rv:154.0) Gecko/154.0 Firefox/154.023×Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:154.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/154.023×Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:134.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/134.023×Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:153.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/153.018×Mozilla/5.0 (Android 16; Mobile; rv:155.0) Gecko/155.0 Firefox/155.02×Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:158.0) Gecko/20100101 /158.0a11×
A User-Agent is self-declared and trivially forged, so this names an observation rather than proving an identity. It is still the strongest signal available: the fingerprint comes off the TLS handshake and the User-Agent off the request that followed, and one client build keeping a stable JA4 while changing what it calls itself is a finding in its own right.
This entry is an observation, not a policy decision. It is here because the edge saw it, not because anyone reviewed it, and it blocks nothing on its own. Only the curated tier drives classification and banning.