t10i640200_a3acda31d846_c2f961105e84
Probe (legacy TLS, no SNI, no ALPN) — inferred from the JA4 handshake shape.
What this fingerprint encodes
t10i640200
handshake shape, human-readable
a3acda31d846
truncated hash of the cipher list
c2f961105e84
truncated hash of extensions + signature algorithms
- Transport
- TCP
- TLS version
- TLS 1.0
- Server name
- no server name (IP literal)
- Cipher suites offered
- 64
- Extensions offered
- 2
- ALPN
- none offered
Same tool, different options
These 11 other fingerprints share this one's JA4_c — the extension and signature-algorithm hash. A client that keeps its extension set constant while varying its cipher list produces exactly this pattern, which is what a scanner iterating cipher suites looks like. A JA3 cannot show you this: its single MD5 collapses ciphers and extensions together, so every variation looks like an unrelated client.
- t10i640200_13a2a23d501b_c2f961105e84
- t10i640200_67f0ca237a44_c2f961105e84
- t10i640200_e31a90cd0803_c2f961105e84
- t10i640200_e7b476f9520b_c2f961105e84
- t10i640200_f559eb9565fd_c2f961105e84
- t11i640200_13a2a23d501b_c2f961105e84
- t11i640200_67f0ca237a44_c2f961105e84
- t11i640200_a3acda31d846_c2f961105e84
- t11i640200_e31a90cd0803_c2f961105e84
- t11i640200_e7b476f9520b_c2f961105e84
- t11i640200_f559eb9565fd_c2f961105e84
The hello it was computed from
Recovered because the proxy now stores the pre-hash JA3 string alongside the digest. Every number below came out of this client's ClientHello; anything we cannot name in the IANA registry is shown as its raw value rather than guessed at.
- Version
- TLS 1.0
Cipher suites 64
-
TLS_RSA_WITH_ARIA_256_GCM_SHA384 -
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_ARIA_256_GCM_SHA384 -
TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 -
49220 (0xc044) -
49234 (0xc052) -
49221 (0xc045) -
49235 (0xc053) -
TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA -
TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256 -
49276 (0xc07c) -
TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA -
TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256 -
49277 (0xc07d) -
TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 -
TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 (draft) -
21 (0x0015) -
TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_SEED_CBC_SHA -
11 (0x000b) -
13 (0x000d) -
48 (0x0030) -
62 (0x003e) -
164 (0x00a4) -
54 (0x0036) -
104 (0x0068) -
165 (0x00a5) -
49214 (0xc03e) -
49240 (0xc058) -
49215 (0xc03f) -
49241 (0xc059) -
66 (0x0042) -
187 (0x00bb) -
49282 (0xc082) -
133 (0x0085) -
193 (0x00c1) -
49283 (0xc083) -
12 (0x000c) -
151 (0x0097) -
14 (0x000e) -
16 (0x0010) -
49 (0x0031) -
63 (0x003f) -
160 (0x00a0) -
55 (0x0037) -
105 (0x0069) -
161 (0x00a1) -
49216 (0xc040) -
49236 (0xc054) -
49217 (0xc041) -
49237 (0xc055) -
67 (0x0043) -
188 (0x00bc) -
49278 (0xc07e) -
134 (0x0086) -
194 (0x00c2) -
49279 (0xc07f) -
15 (0x000f) -
152 (0x0098) -
25 (0x0019) -
23 (0x0017) -
27 (0x001b) -
52 (0x0034) -
108 (0x006c) -
166 (0x00a6) -
58 (0x003a)
Extensions 2
-
supported_groups -
ec_point_formats
Named groups 6
-
secp256r1 -
secp384r1 -
secp521r1 -
x25519 -
ffdhe2048 -
SecP256r1MLKEM768
Point formats 1
-
uncompressed
Raw JA3 string
769,49311-49315-159-49220-49234-49221-49235-69-190-49276-136-196-49277-52394-52245-21-154-11-13-48-62-164-54-104-165-49214-49240-49215-49241-66-187-49282-133-193-49283-12-151-14-16-49-63-160-55-105-161-49216-49236-49217-49237-67-188-49278-134-194-49279-15-152-25-23-27-52-108-166-58,10-11,23-24-25-29-256-4588,0
Seen in live traffic
- Connections
- 5
- First seen
- 2026-08-27 08:43 UTC
- Last seen
- 2026-08-27 08:49 UTC
- Transport
- TCP
- JA3 hashes absorbed
- 2
The same client, 2 different JA3s
This one JA4 covers 2 distinct JA3 hashes. A JA3 hashes the cipher and extension lists in the order they arrived, so a client that shuffles them — which Chrome and its derivatives do on purpose — produces a new JA3 almost every connection and fragments into what looks like 2 unrelated clients. JA4 sorts those lists before hashing, which is why all of it lands here instead.
6660c06945a07c9607b997eddb9c1056d3b255a7a10be1525299b19c5b91a217
This entry is an observation, not a policy decision. It is here because the edge saw it, not because anyone reviewed it, and it blocks nothing on its own. Only the curated tier drives classification and banning.