t13d091100_f91f431d341e_6ecbdee5c734
Shares its JA4_c (6ecbdee5c734) with 2 fingerprints classified as browser, and nothing else in that family disagrees — the same tool under different cipher options. Inferred from the family, not observed directly.
What this fingerprint encodes
t13d091100
handshake shape, human-readable
f91f431d341e
truncated hash of the cipher list
6ecbdee5c734
truncated hash of extensions + signature algorithms
- Transport
- TCP
- TLS version
- TLS 1.3
- Server name
- server name sent
- Cipher suites offered
- 9
- Extensions offered
- 11
- ALPN
- none offered
Same tool, different options
These 4 other fingerprints share this one's JA4_c — the extension and signature-algorithm hash. A client that keeps its extension set constant while varying its cipher list produces exactly this pattern, which is what a scanner iterating cipher suites looks like. A JA3 cannot show you this: its single MD5 collapses ciphers and extensions together, so every variation looks like an unrelated client.
- t13d171100_ab0a1bf427ad_6ecbdee5c734
- t13d301100_1d37bd780c83_6ecbdee5c734
- t13d521100_b262b3658495_6ecbdee5c734
- t13d681100_13e0e9e1c501_6ecbdee5c734
The hello it was computed from
Recovered because the proxy now stores the pre-hash JA3 string alongside the digest. Every number below came out of this client's ClientHello; anything we cannot name in the IANA registry is shown as its raw value rather than guessed at.
- Version
- TLS 1.2
Cipher suites 9
-
TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 -
TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 -
TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 -
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 -
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 -
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 -
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 -
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 -
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256
Extensions 11
-
renegotiation_info -
server_name -
ec_point_formats -
supported_groups -
session_ticket -
encrypt_then_mac -
extended_master_secret -
signature_algorithms -
supported_versions -
psk_key_exchange_modes -
key_share
Named groups 4
-
SecP256r1MLKEM768 -
x25519 -
secp256r1 -
secp384r1
Point formats 3
-
uncompressed -
ansiX962_compressed_prime -
ansiX962_compressed_char2
Raw JA3 string
771,4865-4866-4867-49195-49199-49196-49200-52393-52392,65281-0-11-10-35-22-23-13-43-45-51,4588-29-23-24,0-1-2
Seen in live traffic
- Connections
- 4
- First seen
- 2026-10-06 20:46 UTC
- Last seen
- 2026-10-06 20:46 UTC
- Transport
- TCP
- JA3 hashes absorbed
- 3
The same client, 3 different JA3s
This one JA4 covers 3 distinct JA3 hashes. A JA3 hashes the cipher and extension lists in the order they arrived, so a client that shuffles them — which Chrome and its derivatives do on purpose — produces a new JA3 almost every connection and fragments into what looks like 3 unrelated clients. JA4 sorts those lists before hashing, which is why all of it lands here instead.
92d53e5b9402ec3a4fdcdfc6b33a90d019e43a91e2ef3bbafcd4d7c928cd75cf9e174d5d770d27c79712285d15c53933
This entry is an observation, not a policy decision. It is here because the edge saw it, not because anyone reviewed it, and it blocks nothing on its own. Only the curated tier drives classification and banning.