PQ CRYPTA PLATFORM

🏠 Main

🧪 Interactive Apps

📰 News

🛡️ PQ Crypta Proxy

👤 Account

⟨ QUANTUM ERROR PORTAL ⟩

Navigate the Error Dimensions

PQ Crypta Logo

JA4 t13d380900_a22fda9eb1a3_295fbc80e014

Browser — observed in live traffic

Browser

t13d380900_a22fda9eb1a3_295fbc80e014

Chrome — inferred from the User-Agent on its requests.

What this fingerprint encodes

JA4_a t13d380900 handshake shape, human-readable
JA4_b a22fda9eb1a3 truncated hash of the cipher list
JA4_c 295fbc80e014 truncated hash of extensions + signature algorithms
Transport
TCP
TLS version
TLS 1.3
Server name
server name sent
Cipher suites offered
38
Extensions offered
9
ALPN
none offered

Same tool, different options

These 1 other fingerprints share this one's JA4_c — the extension and signature-algorithm hash. A client that keeps its extension set constant while varying its cipher list produces exactly this pattern, which is what a scanner iterating cipher suites looks like. A JA3 cannot show you this: its single MD5 collapses ciphers and extensions together, so every variation looks like an unrelated client.

The hello it was computed from

Recovered because the proxy now stores the pre-hash JA3 string alongside the digest. Every number below came out of this client's ClientHello; anything we cannot name in the IANA registry is shown as its raw value rather than guessed at.

Version
TLS 1.2

Cipher suites 38

Extensions 9

Named groups 8

Point formats 1

Raw JA3 string
771,4866-4865-49196-49195-49200-49199-159-163-158-162-49188-49192-49187-49191-107-106-103-64-49162-49172-49161-49171-57-56-51-50-157-156-61-60-53-47-49160-49170-22-19-10-255,0-10-11-13-50-23-43-45-51,23-24-25-256-257-258-259-260,0

Seen in live traffic

Connections
1
First seen
2026-09-01 22:27 UTC
Last seen
2026-09-01 22:27 UTC
Transport
TCP

User-Agents seen on this fingerprint

A User-Agent is self-declared and trivially forged, so this names an observation rather than proving an identity. It is still the strongest signal available: the fingerprint comes off the TLS handshake and the User-Agent off the request that followed, and one client build keeping a stable JA4 while changing what it calls itself is a finding in its own right.

This entry is an observation, not a policy decision. It is here because the edge saw it, not because anyone reviewed it, and it blocks nothing on its own. Only the curated tier drives classification and banning.