t13d0213h2_fffbd61365f3_91e936097c5b
Completed a TLS handshake but never an HTTP request, so no User-Agent was ever presented.
What this fingerprint encodes
t13d0213h2
handshake shape, human-readable
fffbd61365f3
truncated hash of the cipher list
91e936097c5b
truncated hash of extensions + signature algorithms
- Transport
- TCP
- TLS version
- TLS 1.3
- Server name
- server name sent
- Cipher suites offered
- 2
- Extensions offered
- 13
- ALPN
- h2
Same tool, different options
These 4 other fingerprints share this one's JA4_c — the extension and signature-algorithm hash. A client that keeps its extension set constant while varying its cipher list produces exactly this pattern, which is what a scanner iterating cipher suites looks like. A JA3 cannot show you this: its single MD5 collapses ciphers and extensions together, so every variation looks like an unrelated client.
- t13d9913h2_20184d8b7b6a_91e936097c5b
- t13d9913h2_3244f97f5040_91e936097c5b
- t13d9913h2_af593f9e21e7_91e936097c5b
- t13d9913h2_f00dd82459a6_91e936097c5b
The hello it was computed from
Recovered because the proxy now stores the pre-hash JA3 string alongside the digest. Every number below came out of this client's ClientHello; anything we cannot name in the IANA registry is shown as its raw value rather than guessed at.
- Version
- TLS 1.2
Cipher suites 2
-
TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 -
TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
Extensions 13
-
renegotiation_info -
signed_certificate_timestamp -
status_request -
server_name -
extended_master_secret -
session_ticket -
signature_algorithms -
ec_point_formats -
supported_groups -
application_layer_protocol_negotiation -
supported_versions -
key_share -
psk_key_exchange_modes
Named groups 36
-
6 (0x0006) -
9 (0x0009) -
secp521r1 -
ffdhe3072 -
10 (0x000a) -
19 (0x0013) -
17 (0x0011) -
22 (0x0016) -
20 (0x0014) -
secp256r1 -
21 (0x0015) -
11 (0x000b) -
14 (0x000e) -
x448 -
18 (0x0012) -
28 (0x001c) -
26 (0x001a) -
5 (0x0005) -
0 (0x0000) -
13 (0x000d) -
ffdhe4096 -
ffdhe2048 -
7 (0x0007) -
27 (0x001b) -
secp384r1 -
8 (0x0008) -
2 (0x0002) -
15 (0x000f) -
3 (0x0003) -
260 (0x0104) -
4 (0x0004) -
1 (0x0001) -
12 (0x000c) -
16 (0x0010) -
x25519 -
259 (0x0103)
Point formats 3
-
uncompressed -
ansiX962_compressed_prime -
ansiX962_compressed_char2
Raw JA3 string
771,4867-4866,65281-18-5-0-23-35-13-11-10-16-43-51-45,6-9-25-257-10-19-17-22-20-23-21-11-14-30-18-28-26-5-0-13-258-256-7-27-24-8-2-15-3-260-4-1-12-16-29-259,0-1-2
Seen in live traffic
- Connections
- 4
- First seen
- 2026-10-21 01:14 UTC
- Last seen
- 2026-10-21 01:14 UTC
- Transport
- TCP
- JA3 hashes absorbed
- 2
The same client, 2 different JA3s
This one JA4 covers 2 distinct JA3 hashes. A JA3 hashes the cipher and extension lists in the order they arrived, so a client that shuffles them — which Chrome and its derivatives do on purpose — produces a new JA3 almost every connection and fragments into what looks like 2 unrelated clients. JA4 sorts those lists before hashing, which is why all of it lands here instead.
bb0606053495d24a07d9a55f59a017410e6cda33850ac797e41f225ca37667b0
This entry is an observation, not a policy decision. It is here because the edge saw it, not because anyone reviewed it, and it blocks nothing on its own. Only the curated tier drives classification and banning.