PQ CRYPTA PLATFORM

🏠 Main

📰 News

👤 Account

⟨ QUANTUM ERROR PORTAL ⟩

Navigate the Error Dimensions

PQ Crypta Logo

JA4 t13d091000_f91f431d341e_c8ddf72c3365

Unclassified — observed in live traffic

Unclassified

t13d091000_f91f431d341e_c8ddf72c3365

Completed a TLS handshake but never an HTTP request, so no User-Agent was ever presented.

What this fingerprint encodes

JA4_a t13d091000 handshake shape, human-readable
JA4_b f91f431d341e truncated hash of the cipher list
JA4_c c8ddf72c3365 truncated hash of extensions + signature algorithms
Transport
TCP
TLS version
TLS 1.3
Server name
server name sent
Cipher suites offered
9
Extensions offered
10
ALPN
none offered

Same tool, different options

These 1 other fingerprints share this one's JA4_c — the extension and signature-algorithm hash. A client that keeps its extension set constant while varying its cipher list produces exactly this pattern, which is what a scanner iterating cipher suites looks like. A JA3 cannot show you this: its single MD5 collapses ciphers and extensions together, so every variation looks like an unrelated client.

The hello it was computed from

Recovered because the proxy now stores the pre-hash JA3 string alongside the digest. Every number below came out of this client's ClientHello; anything we cannot name in the IANA registry is shown as its raw value rather than guessed at.

Version
TLS 1.2

Cipher suites 9

Extensions 10

Named groups 4

Point formats 1

Raw JA3 string
771,4866-4865-4867-49196-49195-52393-49200-49199-52392,43-10-51-23-13-0-11-45-5-65037,4588-29-23-24,0

Seen in live traffic

Connections
3
First seen
2026-10-16 00:36 UTC
Last seen
2026-10-16 01:14 UTC
Transport
TCP
JA3 hashes absorbed
3

The same client, 3 different JA3s

This one JA4 covers 3 distinct JA3 hashes. A JA3 hashes the cipher and extension lists in the order they arrived, so a client that shuffles them — which Chrome and its derivatives do on purpose — produces a new JA3 almost every connection and fragments into what looks like 3 unrelated clients. JA4 sorts those lists before hashing, which is why all of it lands here instead.

This entry is an observation, not a policy decision. It is here because the edge saw it, not because anyone reviewed it, and it blocks nothing on its own. Only the curated tier drives classification and banning.