JA4 t13d1515h2_8daaf6152771_39738fa2155a

t13d1515h2_8daaf6152771_39738fa2155a

Chrome — inferred from the User-Agent on its requests.

What this fingerprint encodes

Transport

TCP

TLS version

TLS 1.3

Server name

server name sent

Cipher suites offered

15

Extensions offered

15

ALPN

h2

Same tool, different options

These 1 other fingerprints share this one's JA4_c — the extension and signature-algorithm hash. A client that keeps its extension set constant while varying its cipher list produces exactly this pattern, which is what a scanner iterating cipher suites looks like. A JA3 cannot show you this: its single MD5 collapses ciphers and extensions together, so every variation looks like an unrelated client.

• t13i1514h2_8daaf6152771_39738fa2155a

The hello it was computed from

Recovered because the proxy now stores the pre-hash JA3 string alongside the digest. Every number below came out of this client's ClientHello; anything we cannot name in the IANA registry is shown as its raw value rather than guessed at.

Version

TLS 1.2

Cipher suites 15

• TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
• TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
• TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256
• TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
• TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
• TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
• TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
• TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256
• TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256
• TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA
• TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA
• TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
• TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
• TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA
• TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA

Extensions 15

• renegotiation_info
• signed_certificate_timestamp
• server_name
• encrypted_client_hello
• supported_versions
• 17613 (0x44cd)
• extended_master_secret
• compress_certificate
• ec_point_formats
• signature_algorithms
• application_layer_protocol_negotiation
• supported_groups
• status_request
• session_ticket
• key_share

Named groups 4

• SecP256r1MLKEM768
• x25519
• secp256r1
• secp384r1

Point formats 1

• uncompressed

771,4865-4866-4867-49195-49199-49196-49200-52393-52392-49171-49172-156-157-47-53,65281-18-0-65037-43-17613-23-27-11-13-16-10-5-35-51,4588-29-23-24,0

Seen in live traffic

Connections

10

First seen

2026-09-07 07:15 UTC

Last seen

2026-09-30 14:20 UTC

Transport

TCP

JA3 hashes absorbed

10

The same client, 10 different JA3s

This one JA4 covers 10 distinct JA3 hashes. A JA3 hashes the cipher and extension lists in the order they arrived, so a client that shuffles them — which Chrome and its derivatives do on purpose — produces a new JA3 almost every connection and fragments into what looks like 10 unrelated clients. JA4 sorts those lists before hashing, which is why all of it lands here instead.

• d36f7080ce0bb0a2c1918a24c831eb99
• 702f26e04ec050bdbdbdd6bab5210a83
• 3bbb5a736d3b361ee64c760ed46f3f85
• b8495e35b5b2f5e54281f786f979cc09
• 6503d1df0cbdebc49065d9977b496c0d
• 5f9e66123c61a5e5377c7e5e4e6c1ee9
• a5fae39c2b553337d4b2f1620aeec0ec
• 7a09318b563cac11c2b006d3717eb1c7
• c69f8f254000a5821a91ef44e6758130
• a7926636d0f1a01b095efbcdbc4c18aa

User-Agents seen on this fingerprint

• Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/133.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 4×
• Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Safari/537.36 (compatible; Bytespider; spider-feedback@bytedance.com) 2×
• Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/146.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 1×
• Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Safari/537.36 (compatible; Bytespider; https://zhanzhang.toutiao.com/) 1×

A User-Agent is self-declared and trivially forged, so this names an observation rather than proving an identity. It is still the strongest signal available: the fingerprint comes off the TLS handshake and the User-Agent off the request that followed, and one client build keeping a stable JA4 while changing what it calls itself is a finding in its own right.

This entry is an observation, not a policy decision. It is here because the edge saw it, not because anyone reviewed it, and it blocks nothing on its own. Only the curated tier drives classification and banning.