t13d1515h2_8daaf6152771_f8ed8b5d7f00
Chrome — inferred from the User-Agent on its requests.
What this fingerprint encodes
t13d1515h2
handshake shape, human-readable
8daaf6152771
truncated hash of the cipher list
f8ed8b5d7f00
truncated hash of extensions + signature algorithms
- Transport
- TCP
- TLS version
- TLS 1.3
- Server name
- server name sent
- Cipher suites offered
- 15
- Extensions offered
- 15
- ALPN
- h2
Same tool, different options
These 3 other fingerprints share this one's JA4_c — the extension and signature-algorithm hash. A client that keeps its extension set constant while varying its cipher list produces exactly this pattern, which is what a scanner iterating cipher suites looks like. A JA3 cannot show you this: its single MD5 collapses ciphers and extensions together, so every variation looks like an unrelated client.
- t13d151400_8daaf6152771_f8ed8b5d7f00
- t13i151300_8daaf6152771_f8ed8b5d7f00
- t13i1514h2_8daaf6152771_f8ed8b5d7f00
The hello it was computed from
Recovered because the proxy now stores the pre-hash JA3 string alongside the digest. Every number below came out of this client's ClientHello; anything we cannot name in the IANA registry is shown as its raw value rather than guessed at.
- Version
- TLS 1.2
Cipher suites 15
-
TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 -
TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 -
TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 -
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 -
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 -
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 -
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 -
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 -
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 -
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA -
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA -
TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 -
TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 -
TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA -
TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA
Extensions 15
-
ec_point_formats -
renegotiation_info -
supported_groups -
17613 (0x44cd) -
extended_master_secret -
supported_versions -
session_ticket -
compress_certificate -
status_request -
signature_algorithms -
server_name -
psk_key_exchange_modes -
encrypted_client_hello -
application_layer_protocol_negotiation -
key_share
Named groups 4
-
SecP256r1MLKEM768 -
x25519 -
secp256r1 -
secp384r1
Point formats 1
-
uncompressed
Raw JA3 string
771,4865-4866-4867-49195-49199-49196-49200-52393-52392-49171-49172-156-157-47-53,11-65281-10-17613-23-43-35-27-5-13-0-45-65037-16-51,4588-29-23-24,0
Seen in live traffic
- Connections
- 16
- First seen
- 2026-09-07 09:06 UTC
- Last seen
- 2026-10-05 23:02 UTC
- Transport
- TCP
- JA3 hashes absorbed
- 16
The same client, 16 different JA3s
This one JA4 covers 16 distinct JA3 hashes. A JA3 hashes the cipher and extension lists in the order they arrived, so a client that shuffles them — which Chrome and its derivatives do on purpose — produces a new JA3 almost every connection and fragments into what looks like 16 unrelated clients. JA4 sorts those lists before hashing, which is why all of it lands here instead.
c1ce0a4b67bb7b2d7add21d47527f704cfed93633d7f45dd7aaeb98abd27cf3f5bfffbc2aa3a8e6586990fa624e795338afd2e09001a234f00b3ecd0e6c08879e787cfa101379d9a5a549be677c45e4cd2bf1a69c4cd6d486d2fc025b07c58457667cfc180c90b4f509820c1155c89979a220bfa073c66f631ad541fb6b4b1201e2ff800bb90ffd7e8e3807e543edbe3d90a1261f5c3c5bfad4f2841d72dd0acea6cad3c678ac10a31c37532457911e2d01cb944ccafe9b609d43ebd02127eb5- … and 4 more
User-Agents seen on this fingerprint
Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/149.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.3614×Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/133.0.0.0 Safari/537.364×Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) HeadlessChrome/146.0.7680.165 Safari/537.362×Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/142.0.0.0 Safari/537.361×Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/135.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/135.0.0.01×Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/130.1.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/130.1.01×Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Safari/537.36 (compatible; Bytespider; spider-feedback@bytedance.com)1×Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Safari/537.36 (compatible; TikTokSpider; ttspider-feedback@tiktok.com)1×
A User-Agent is self-declared and trivially forged, so this names an observation rather than proving an identity. It is still the strongest signal available: the fingerprint comes off the TLS handshake and the User-Agent off the request that followed, and one client build keeping a stable JA4 while changing what it calls itself is a finding in its own right.
This entry is an observation, not a policy decision. It is here because the edge saw it, not because anyone reviewed it, and it blocks nothing on its own. Only the curated tier drives classification and banning.