t13i190800_9dc949149365_97f8aa674fd9
Censys — inferred from the User-Agent on its requests.
What this fingerprint encodes
t13i190800
handshake shape, human-readable
9dc949149365
truncated hash of the cipher list
97f8aa674fd9
truncated hash of extensions + signature algorithms
- Transport
- TCP
- TLS version
- TLS 1.3
- Server name
- no server name (IP literal)
- Cipher suites offered
- 19
- Extensions offered
- 8
- ALPN
- none offered
Same tool, different options
These 4 other fingerprints share this one's JA4_c — the extension and signature-algorithm hash. A client that keeps its extension set constant while varying its cipher list produces exactly this pattern, which is what a scanner iterating cipher suites looks like. A JA3 cannot show you this: its single MD5 collapses ciphers and extensions together, so every variation looks like an unrelated client.
- t13i030800_55b375c5d22e_97f8aa674fd9
- t13i250800_b78ed14e2fd0_97f8aa674fd9
- t13i260800_3309cf098094_97f8aa674fd9
- t13i270800_fa4239e4ca25_97f8aa674fd9
The hello it was computed from
Recovered because the proxy now stores the pre-hash JA3 string alongside the digest. Every number below came out of this client's ClientHello; anything we cannot name in the IANA registry is shown as its raw value rather than guessed at.
- Version
- TLS 1.2
Cipher suites 19
-
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 -
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 -
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 -
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 -
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 -
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 -
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA -
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA -
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA -
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA -
TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 -
TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 -
TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA -
TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA -
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA -
TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA -
TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 -
TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 -
TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
Extensions 8
-
status_request -
supported_groups -
ec_point_formats -
signature_algorithms -
renegotiation_info -
signed_certificate_timestamp -
supported_versions -
key_share
Named groups 4
-
x25519 -
secp256r1 -
secp384r1 -
secp521r1
Point formats 1
-
uncompressed
Raw JA3 string
771,52392-52393-49199-49200-49195-49196-49171-49161-49172-49162-156-157-47-53-49170-10-4867-4865-4866,5-10-11-13-65281-18-43-51,29-23-24-25,0
Seen in live traffic
- Connections
- 1183
- First seen
- 2026-08-23 02:24 UTC
- Last seen
- 2026-10-10 01:32 UTC
- Transport
- TCP
- JA3 hashes absorbed
- 12
The same client, 12 different JA3s
This one JA4 covers 12 distinct JA3 hashes. A JA3 hashes the cipher and extension lists in the order they arrived, so a client that shuffles them — which Chrome and its derivatives do on purpose — produces a new JA3 almost every connection and fragments into what looks like 12 unrelated clients. JA4 sorts those lists before hashing, which is why all of it lands here instead.
35fa0a83e466acbec1cfbb9016d550ab19e29534fd49dd27d09234e639c4057ef72589e607f9b36992b6b437ce399f26e873803ab6f54f1316b295ee4fbea1d2e5c250b292fce278a62137836169e18ff6b1f1a5591b53aa4d6b4a8de8e50ce689be98bbd4f065fe510fca4893cf8d9bcdcd3b10ffd65fac11ce29e16f5eb298f6d196664c46af2b855543bd1aa928a3cd85bb33041239351d5176c5e28b0e8a5fa4ff59c82a0e63a1ba6e3c0837997ba091724136011a85b21838e770d000a4
User-Agents seen on this fingerprint
Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; CensysInspect/1.1; +https://about.censys.io/)363×Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/136.0.0.0 Safari/537.36135×Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/32.012×Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/86.0.4 240.111 Safari/537.3611×Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; ModatScanner/1.2; +https://modat.io/)11×l9explore/1.2.23×Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_12_1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/54.0.2840.98 Safari/537.363×Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_14_2) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/13.1 Safari/605.1.151×Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 8.1.0; es-us; Redmi Note 5 Build/OPM1.171019.011) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/71.0.3578.141 Mobile Safari/537.36 XiaoMi1×Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_13_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/75.0.3770.100 Safari/537.361×
A User-Agent is self-declared and trivially forged, so this names an observation rather than proving an identity. It is still the strongest signal available: the fingerprint comes off the TLS handshake and the User-Agent off the request that followed, and one client build keeping a stable JA4 while changing what it calls itself is a finding in its own right.
This entry is an observation, not a policy decision. It is here because the edge saw it, not because anyone reviewed it, and it blocks nothing on its own. Only the curated tier drives classification and banning.