Objected, but at the QUIC layer (rejected at the QUIC layer with INTERNAL_ERROR), so the HTTP/3 error code could not be read. §8.1 carries an HTTP/3 connection error in an application close, and this test asks for 0x105 specifically — whether that was the client's reasoning is not observable from here.
The suite could not establish what this client does here. That is a shortcoming of the run rather than anything about the client, and every one of these is on our list to remove.
What was measured
- Client
- curl — ngtcp2 + nghttp3, ngtcp2/1.11.0
- Test
- MAX_PUSH_ID sent by the server —
h-max-push-id - Clause
- RFC 9114 §7.2.7 (MUST NOT)
- Class
- correctness — Rejected something invalid, with the code the RFC names.
- Required behaviour
- Reject with H3_FRAME_UNEXPECTED. MAX_PUSH_ID travels client to server only, so a server sending one is using a frame in a direction the specification does not allow.
- Measured
- 2026-09-18
Reproduce it
The suite is the judge, so the reproduction is to point the same client at the same test and let the server report what it saw.
SESSION=$(curl -sX POST https://conformance.pqcrypta.com/session | jq -r .id)
# then drive curl at the test URL and read the verdict:
curl -s https://conformance.pqcrypta.com/report/$SESSION.json | jq '.results["h-max-push-id"]'