Rejected with the required error code 0x108.
The client did what the clause requires.
What was measured
- Client
- quic-go — quic-go, quic-go v0.61.0
- Test
- A second GOAWAY naming a larger identifier than the first —
h-goaway-increasing - Clause
- RFC 9114 §5.2 (MUST)
- Class
- correctness — Rejected something invalid, with the code the RFC names.
- Required behaviour
- Close the connection with H3_ID_ERROR. §5.2 permits multiple GOAWAY frames but requires the identifier in each to be no greater than any previously sent, because the identifier is a promise about what will still be processed and raising it takes that promise back. "Receiving a GOAWAY containing a larger identifier than previously received MUST be treated as a connection error of type H3_ID_ERROR."
- Measured
- 2026-09-18
Reproduce it
The suite is the judge, so the reproduction is to point the same client at the same test and let the server report what it saw.
SESSION=$(curl -sX POST https://conformance.pqcrypta.com/session | jq -r .id)
# then drive quic-go at the test URL and read the verdict:
curl -s https://conformance.pqcrypta.com/report/$SESSION.json | jq '.results["h-goaway-increasing"]'