xquic — SETTINGS containing the same identifier twice

Inconclusive

The run did not exercise this test: the connection failed during the handshake (detected an error with protocol compliance that was not covered by more specific error codes in STREAMS_BLOCKED_BIDI: illegal frame type in handshake), so the client never reached the anomaly.

The run did not establish what this client does here — either it was never put in the situation, or its answer admits more than one reading. Not a failure, and never counted as one.

What was measured

Client

xquic — Alibaba xquic + BoringSSL, 2060a44

Test

SETTINGS containing the same identifier twice — h-duplicate-setting

Clause

RFC 9114 §7.2.4 (MAY)

Class

discretionary — The RFC permits either behaviour; the report says which was chosen.

Required behaviour

Either reject with H3_SETTINGS_ERROR or ignore the repeat — the specification says a receiver MAY treat this as an error, so both are conformant.

Measured

2026-09-18

Reproduce it

The suite is the judge, so the reproduction is to point the same client at the same test and let the server report what it saw.

SESSION=$(curl -sX POST https://conformance.pqcrypta.com/session | jq -r .id)
# then drive xquic at the test URL and read the verdict:
curl -s https://conformance.pqcrypta.com/report/$SESSION.json | jq '.results["h-duplicate-setting"]'