The run did not exercise this test: the connection failed during the handshake (detected an error with protocol compliance that was not covered by more specific error codes in STREAMS_BLOCKED_BIDI: illegal frame type in handshake), so the client never reached the anomaly.
The run did not establish what this client does here — either it was never put in the situation, or its answer admits more than one reading. Not a failure, and never counted as one.
What was measured
- Client
- xquic — Alibaba xquic + BoringSSL, 2060a44
- Test
- Field lines referencing dynamic table insertions —
h-qpack-dynamic-table - Clause
- RFC 9204 §4.3.3, §4.5.2 (MUST)
- Class
- interoperability — Correctly decoded something valid but demanding.
- Required behaviour
- Apply the encoder-stream insertions and decode the headers correctly.
- Measured
- 2026-09-18
Reproduce it
The suite is the judge, so the reproduction is to point the same client at the same test and let the server report what it saw.
SESSION=$(curl -sX POST https://conformance.pqcrypta.com/session | jq -r .id)
# then drive xquic at the test URL and read the verdict:
curl -s https://conformance.pqcrypta.com/report/$SESSION.json | jq '.results["h-qpack-dynamic-table"]'
What this suite is · The full grid · All clients · All tests · Findings