xquic — Huffman-coded field lines with maximal padding

Inconclusive

The run did not exercise this test: the connection failed during the handshake (detected an error with protocol compliance that was not covered by more specific error codes in STREAMS_BLOCKED_BIDI: illegal frame type in handshake), so the client never reached the anomaly.

The run did not establish what this client does here — either it was never put in the situation, or its answer admits more than one reading. Not a failure, and never counted as one.

What was measured

Client

xquic — Alibaba xquic + BoringSSL, 2060a44

Test

Huffman-coded field lines with maximal padding — h-qpack-huffman

Clause

RFC 9204 §4.1.2, RFC 7541 §5.2 (MUST)

Class

interoperability — Correctly decoded something valid but demanding.

Required behaviour

Decode without error. Padding of up to 7 bits is legal, not corruption.

Measured

2026-09-18

Reproduce it

The suite is the judge, so the reproduction is to point the same client at the same test and let the server report what it saw.

SESSION=$(curl -sX POST https://conformance.pqcrypta.com/session | jq -r .id)
# then drive xquic at the test URL and read the verdict:
curl -s https://conformance.pqcrypta.com/report/$SESSION.json | jq '.results["h-qpack-huffman"]'